Capital Gains Tax (Effective) in Nepal compared to Asia
Footnote |
Export
Sort:
Alphabetically |
Ascending Rank |
Descending Rank
South Korea |
![]() |
Thailand |
![]() |
Taiwan |
![]() |
Philippines |
![]() |
Bangladesh |
![]() |
India |
![]() |
Azerbaijan |
![]() |
Nepal |
![]() |
Laos |
![]() |
China |
![]() |
Uzbekistan |
![]() |
Cambodia |
![]() |
Japan |
![]() |
Kazakhstan |
![]() |
Macau |
![]() |
Myanmar |
![]() |
Sri Lanka |
![]() |
Indonesia |
![]() |
Malaysia |
![]() |
Georgia |
![]() |
Mongolia |
![]() |
Vietnam |
![]() |
Pakistan |
![]() |
Hong Kong |
![]() |
Singapore |
![]() |
Nepal: Capital gains taxes (%).
In arriving at effective capital gains tax rates, the Global Property Guide makes the following assumptions:
- The property is directly and jointly owned by husband and wife;
- They have owned it for 10 years;
- It is their only source of capital gains in the country
- It has appreciated in value by 100% over the 10 years to sale
- The property was worth US$250,000 or 250,000 at purchase.
- It is not their sole or principal residence.
These assumptions are critical. In many countries a holding period of less than 5 years results in capital gains being taxable. But a longer holding period often results in no capital gains tax being payable. For more details see the Data FAQ
Source: Global Property Guide Research, Contributing Accounting Firms